DC vs. AC Ohmic Losses in a PV System
In a photovoltaic system, energy follows this simplified path:
PV modules (DC) → DC cables → inverter → AC cables → (optional AC transformer) → grid
At each stage where there are conductors (cables, transformer windings), some of the power is lost as heat: these are ohmic losses.
The basic law is the same everywhere:
- \(R\): resistance of the conductors \((\mathrm{\Omega})\)
- \(I\): current flowing \((\mathrm{A})\)
- \(P_{\mathsf{losses}}\): power lost \((\mathrm{W})\)
What differs between DC and AC are:
- the location where the losses occur,
- the voltage and current levels,
- and how they are expressed (as a % of DC losses, as a % of AC losses, etc.).
1. Ohmic losses on the DC side
On the direct current side, between the modules and the inverter, we find:
- string cables (between modules in the same string),
- busbar cables (junction boxes, DC cabinets),
- DC cables leading to the inverter inputs.
This entire network can be combined into an equivalent DC resistance \(R_{\mathsf{DC}}\), as seen from the PV array.
The instantaneous losses in this section are given by:
where \(I_{\mathsf{DC}}\) is the total current delivered by the PV array.
Important characteristics on the DC side:
- voltages are relatively high, but so are currents (especially in direct sunlight),
- cable lengths between PV arrays and the inverter can be significant,
- DC losses depend very heavily on the cross-sectional area of the cables and the number of strings in parallel.
Example 1 – DC losses expressed as a percentage of the PV array’s rated power
Data:
- PV array: \(100\ \mathrm{kWp}\)
- Operating DC voltage: \(800\ \mathrm{V}\)
- Rated DC power: \(100\ \mathrm{kW}\)
- Total DC current:
- Equivalent round-trip resistance of the DC cables: \(0{,}20\ \mathrm{\Omega}\)
Calculation of DC losses
Joule losses:
Expression as a percentage
🧠 Interpretation
- DC losses are expressed as a percentage of the PV array’s rated power
- Here, 3.1% is a relatively high value
- This may be due to:
- excessively long cables,
- insufficient cross-sectional area,
- high currents in the strings.
👉 In PV design, the goal is generally ≤ 1 to 2% DC losses.
2. Ohmic losses on the AC side
After the inverter, we move to the alternating current side:
- AC cables between the inverter and the delivery point,
- possibly one or more AC transformers (LV/MV, MV/HV).
In this AC section, there are:
a. Ohmic losses in AC cables
- the cables have a resistance \(R_{\mathsf{AC}}\),
- the losses are:
b. Copper losses in transformers
- in the windings (wire resistance),
- same law:
c. Iron losses in the transformer (non-ohmic, but worth noting)
- in the magnetic core,
- present as soon as the transformer is energized, even at low load,
- they are often modeled as "nearly constant" power.
On the AC side, voltages are generally higher (\(400\ \mathrm{V}\), \(20\ \mathrm{kV}\), etc.) than on the DC side; therefore, for the same power, currents are lower → ohmic losses can be more limited, even over long distances.
Example 2 – AC losses expressed as a percentage of the inverter/substation’s rated power
Data:
- Inverter: \(100\ \mathrm{kVA}\)
- Three-phase AC voltage: \(400\ \mathrm{V}\)
- Power factor ≈ 1
- AC rated power: \(100\ \mathrm{kW}\)
- AC current:
- Equivalent resistance of AC cables (per phase): \(0{,}05\ \mathrm{\Omega}\)
- Number of phases: 3
Calculation of AC losses (copper)
Expression as a percentage
🧠 Interpretation
- AC losses are relative to the rated power of the inverter or substation
- Even though the currents are lower than in DC,
- the losses remain significant because:
- the power levels are high,
- there may be transformers (copper losses + iron losses).
👉 In practice:
- AC cables: often < 1%
- HV substation: an additional 1 to 2% possible
3. Comparing DC and AC losses in a PV system
We can summarize as follows:
- DC (modules → inverter)
- generally higher currents,
- cables sometimes long with small cross-sections (strings),
- significant losses if cross-sections are too small or distances are long,
- often expressed as a % of DC losses relative to the PV array’s rated power.
- AC (inverter → grid)
- higher voltages, therefore lower currents for the same power,
- AC cables + transformers (copper losses + iron losses),
- ohmic losses sometimes lower in %, but at high power levels, so must be monitored,
- often expressed as a % of AC losses at the inverter/substation’s rated power.
Key point: DC ohmic losses
- Between modules and inverter (string cables, enclosures, DC connections).
-
Modeled by an equivalent DC resistance and the law:
- \(P_{\mathsf{losses,DC}} = R_{\mathsf{DC}} \cdot I_{\mathsf{DC}}^{2}\)
- Losses increase with the square of the current and cable lengths.
AC Ohmic Losses
- Between inverter and grid (AC cables + transformer windings).
- Copper losses: same ohmic laws \(R \cdot I^{2}\).
- Iron losses in transformers: present as soon as the transformer is energized.
DC vs. AC Comparison
- DC side: higher currents → significant losses in cables if the cross-section is undersized.
- AC side: lower currents (higher voltage), but the presence of transformers and sometimes long cables.
- In practice, we often refer to "% DC losses" and "% AC losses" at full power, but the annual energy lost is lower than the sum of these percentages.